Digital Approvals for Async Teams
Async teams thrive on one principle: nobody should be blocked waiting for someone in a different time zone to be online at the same time.
Remote and distributed teams have gotten remarkably good at asynchronous communication. We write detailed messages instead of scheduling meetings. We record video walkthroughs instead of doing live demos. We use shared documents with comment threads instead of real-time editing sessions. But there is one area where many async teams still fall back on synchronous, friction-heavy processes: approvals and sign-offs. Getting a document approved or a contract signed still often requires coordinating schedules, sending reminders, and waiting for someone to be available.
The Approval Bottleneck in Distributed Work
When your team spans multiple time zones, every approval that requires real-time coordination adds a full day of latency at minimum. If you send a document for sign-off at 4 PM in New York, your colleague in Tokyo will not see it until their morning, which is your evening. Their response arrives while you are asleep. A single round trip takes 24 hours. Add a revision cycle and you are looking at three to four days for something that should take 15 minutes of total effort.
On an Axtio board, these approval tasks pile up in the "Other" court. You can see them sitting there, waiting, but you cannot do anything about them until the other person acts. The key insight is that the problem is not the person; it is the process. If the approval mechanism is lightweight enough, people will do it the moment they see it, regardless of time zone.
Making Sign-Offs Lightweight
The best async approval workflows share a common trait: they require minimal effort from the approver. A PDF that needs a signature should not require downloading an app, creating an account, or figuring out a complex interface. Tools like Docento make this straightforward. The signer opens the PDF, adds their digital signature, and the document is done. No accounts to create, no software to install, no coordination required. The entire action can be completed in the approver's own time, on their own schedule.
This is the async ideal applied to document workflows: send the request, let the other person handle it when they are ready, and pick up the result when it appears. No scheduling, no reminders, no waiting on overlapping working hours.
Visibility Without Synchronization
The other half of the equation is tracking. In an async team, you need to know the status of every pending approval without asking anyone. This is where a board-based system shines. In Axtio, every pending sign-off is an action card in the "Other" court, assigned to the person responsible. When they complete it, the card moves. You do not need a status meeting or a Slack message to find out. The board tells you.
Combined with a fast signing tool like Docento, you get a complete async approval pipeline: create the action, assign the signer, track it on the board, and close it when the signed document comes back. Every step is visible, none of it requires anyone to be online at the same time, and the total turnaround time drops from days to hours.
Designing for the Async Default
The teams that operate best asynchronously are the ones that design every process with the assumption that no two people will be online simultaneously. Approvals, sign-offs, and document workflows are no exception. Choose tools that do not require real-time interaction. Track everything on a shared board so status is always visible. Make every request self-contained so the recipient has everything they need to act without asking follow-up questions. When you build your approval workflow this way, time zones stop being a constraint and start being an advantage: work moves forward around the clock.
Explore how Axtio handles delegation and ownership in our article on accountability in a 2D world.